<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The GNU License Paradox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://millionclues.com/out-of-the-box/fun/gnu-license-paradox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://millionclues.com/out-of-the-box/fun/gnu-license-paradox/</link>
	<description>WordPress Tips and Hacks, Blogging, Softwares and the Web. Technology Guide For The Digital Citizen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:22:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://millionclues.com/out-of-the-box/fun/gnu-license-paradox/#comment-4762</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millionclues.com/?p=290#comment-4762</guid>
		<description>Creative Commons is the sweet version of the whole non-human license. I dont think most people read the TOS, but many read CC license&#039;s. Kudos to them, great idea infact</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creative Commons is the sweet version of the whole non-human license. I dont think most people read the TOS, but many read CC license&#8217;s. Kudos to them, great idea infact</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Babu</title>
		<link>http://millionclues.com/out-of-the-box/fun/gnu-license-paradox/#comment-4644</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Babu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millionclues.com/?p=290#comment-4644</guid>
		<description>why do u think i use creative commons?

coz i&#039;d like to read the texts meant for humans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do u think i use creative commons?</p>
<p>coz i&#8217;d like to read the texts meant for humans</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://millionclues.com/out-of-the-box/fun/gnu-license-paradox/#comment-4636</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millionclues.com/?p=290#comment-4636</guid>
		<description>Thats why I call it a paradox, I am glad someone thought about it seriously. 

BTW, The switching guide on your site is gonna be helpful for me sometime, I had bookmarked it the day you first came in here.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats why I call it a paradox, I am glad someone thought about it seriously. </p>
<p>BTW, The switching guide on your site is gonna be helpful for me sometime, I had bookmarked it the day you first came in here.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sathya</title>
		<link>http://millionclues.com/out-of-the-box/fun/gnu-license-paradox/#comment-4635</link>
		<dc:creator>Sathya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millionclues.com/?p=290#comment-4635</guid>
		<description>Hey I didn&#039;t take it seriously, I got your point. GPL allows for freedom of the s/w, not for the license ;) you give people the freedom to edit the license then the s/w itself won&#039;t have the freedom, now won&#039;t that be another thing to think on ;)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I didn&#8217;t take it seriously, I got your point. GPL allows for freedom of the s/w, not for the license <img src='http://millionclues.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  you give people the freedom to edit the license then the s/w itself won&#8217;t have the freedom, now won&#8217;t that be another thing to think on <img src='http://millionclues.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://millionclues.com/out-of-the-box/fun/gnu-license-paradox/#comment-4631</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millionclues.com/?p=290#comment-4631</guid>
		<description>I love reading official papers, those are the real professional documents, you can learn how to write professionally by reading them. Try it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love reading official papers, those are the real professional documents, you can learn how to write professionally by reading them. Try it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Babu</title>
		<link>http://millionclues.com/out-of-the-box/fun/gnu-license-paradox/#comment-4507</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Babu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millionclues.com/?p=290#comment-4507</guid>
		<description>Great to know you actually read this stuff.. you shudda been a lawyer..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to know you actually read this stuff.. you shudda been a lawyer..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://millionclues.com/out-of-the-box/fun/gnu-license-paradox/#comment-2381</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millionclues.com/?p=290#comment-2381</guid>
		<description>Hey, I think you took that matter too seriously. Just one question, Can we edit the GNU license and distribute..? 
What I meant was that, you can edit the softwares under GPL but you are not free to edit the license. But they say GPL means freedom. Got my point..?

BTW, this post was just meant for fun only, no offense.. lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I think you took that matter too seriously. Just one question, Can we edit the GNU license and distribute..?<br />
What I meant was that, you can edit the softwares under GPL but you are not free to edit the license. But they say GPL means freedom. Got my point..?</p>
<p>BTW, this post was just meant for fun only, no offense.. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sathya</title>
		<link>http://millionclues.com/out-of-the-box/fun/gnu-license-paradox/#comment-2301</link>
		<dc:creator>Sathya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 07:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millionclues.com/?p=290#comment-2301</guid>
		<description>The GPL doesn&#039;t state that you cannot sell your program or profit from it, neither it mention that the source code has to be included, though it does mention the source code has to be available in a location that is publicly accessible.
I still fail to understand, how you feel that &quot;the freedom to modify the software but the license that covers the software is not free to modify&quot; is a paradox.

FWIW, you _can_ link GNU license to a propreitory/closed source software, just that the GNU license is a GNU LGPL. My point about the last statement being - there are different types of GNU License, just explicitly mention the license you are discussing about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GPL doesn&#8217;t state that you cannot sell your program or profit from it, neither it mention that the source code has to be included, though it does mention the source code has to be available in a location that is publicly accessible.<br />
I still fail to understand, how you feel that &#8220;the freedom to modify the software but the license that covers the software is not free to modify&#8221; is a paradox.</p>
<p>FWIW, you _can_ link GNU license to a propreitory/closed source software, just that the GNU license is a GNU LGPL. My point about the last statement being &#8211; there are different types of GNU License, just explicitly mention the license you are discussing about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://millionclues.com/out-of-the-box/fun/gnu-license-paradox/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millionclues.com/?p=290#comment-735</guid>
		<description>GPL licence should be included? I have seem many free softwares that just give link to the GPL licence instead of providing it. Thanks for adding to the discussion. 
I think its the Viral Nature of the Licence that makes it a paradox.
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GPL licence should be included? I have seem many free softwares that just give link to the GPL licence instead of providing it. Thanks for adding to the discussion.<br />
I think its the Viral Nature of the Licence that makes it a paradox.<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ej-web-development</title>
		<link>http://millionclues.com/out-of-the-box/fun/gnu-license-paradox/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>ej-web-development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.millionclues.com/?p=290#comment-718</guid>
		<description>The GNU GPL permits you to make changes to the software, not the license.

Part of the GNU GPL states that you have to include a copy of the license in any derivative work and that any derivative work must be under the same license as the original. This means that you cannot make any closed source add-on or modification to any GPL&#039;ed code. This is what people call the &quot;viral nature&quot; of the GPL.

I personally prefer the BSD license as it is less restrictive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GNU GPL permits you to make changes to the software, not the license.</p>
<p>Part of the GNU GPL states that you have to include a copy of the license in any derivative work and that any derivative work must be under the same license as the original. This means that you cannot make any closed source add-on or modification to any GPL&#8217;ed code. This is what people call the &#8220;viral nature&#8221; of the GPL.</p>
<p>I personally prefer the BSD license as it is less restrictive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

